A batch of QSL cards arrived from the bureau today (thanks, Ian.) Here are just a few of them.
Showing posts with label QSLing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label QSLing. Show all posts
Monday, January 13, 2014
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Sunday, February 24, 2013
QSLs sent
I have just sent a new batch of QSLs via GlobalQSL for printing and distributing via the bureau. I like the Global QSL service. It takes away the chore of sending QSL cards and reduces the work to a simple log export to ADIF file.
I had to purchase 1000 new card credits before I could upload them. Today's batch, from last summer until now, was over 400 contacts on 398 cards. That's excluding local FM QSOs and contest contacts. I didn't realize I was so active on the air. At that rate I'll be ordering another batch before the year is out!
I had to purchase 1000 new card credits before I could upload them. Today's batch, from last summer until now, was over 400 contacts on 398 cards. That's excluding local FM QSOs and contest contacts. I didn't realize I was so active on the air. At that rate I'll be ordering another batch before the year is out!
Saturday, February 23, 2013
eQSL fraud?
In the last couple of weeks I have received two eQSLs for contacts that never happened. The QSLs were from made-up callsigns that are clearly SWLs, e.g. UA-123456. But the message with the card says simply: TNX For QSO TU 73! Curiously, both QSLs contained exactly the same wording.
Now I have nothing against SWLs. I started in this hobby as a broadcast SWL and I feel that all hams should have had experience as an SWL to get familiar with procedures, propagation and so on. But I am uncomfortable with receiving eQSLs from listeners as the eQSL system has no way to distinguish a listener report from an actual contact so their presence messes up my totals.
In practice it isn't a big mess-up as I have never received an SWL card from a country I haven't had a proper QSO with. So I do accept eQSLs that make it clear they are for reception of a contact I made. But TNX FOR QSO? Who do they think they are kidding, and what do they hope to gain from it?
Now I have nothing against SWLs. I started in this hobby as a broadcast SWL and I feel that all hams should have had experience as an SWL to get familiar with procedures, propagation and so on. But I am uncomfortable with receiving eQSLs from listeners as the eQSL system has no way to distinguish a listener report from an actual contact so their presence messes up my totals.
In practice it isn't a big mess-up as I have never received an SWL card from a country I haven't had a proper QSO with. So I do accept eQSLs that make it clear they are for reception of a contact I made. But TNX FOR QSO? Who do they think they are kidding, and what do they hope to gain from it?
Thursday, December 13, 2012
QSLs received
Friday, September 07, 2012
Which ham sites would you really miss?
The amount asked for Bronze membership is $20.00 US. But if you think that's too much you can pay any amount, even as little as $5. You could probably get away with $1 but surely nobody is that cheap?
Bronze membership is really worth it because it allows you to use your own QSL design. Free members only get a plain text card which is pretty boring.
I'm glad eQSL allows free membership because it's better to have as many hams as possible registered with the system (and hopefully take the steps needed to become Authenticity Guaranteed) even if they don't pay a cent. According to eQSL nearly 90% of members never donate any money. I'm not very good at mental arithmetic but if every user paid something then the minimum membership fee would be about $2 a year I think.
It's always tempting to freeload, to put off donating until another day, but I think everyone should donate to help keep running the sites they use most.
Here's my list of sites I use most every day and would really miss:
There are a couple of omissions that may surprise you. But those big sites you're thinking of must make enough from advertising to get along without my help. I probably visit them less than once a week, so I wouldn't miss them as much as the sites in my list.
Which ham radio sites would you really miss if they closed tomorrow?
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Latest QSLs
A batch of QSLs just arrived from the RSGB Bureau. Here are a few of the more attractive ones. Enjoy!
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
DXXX QSLs
I happened to visit the web site of Andy, GD0TEP this afternoon and noticed that he had a link to a page of scanned images of his QSL collection. These are not your average QSL cards, but ones containing images of attractive young ladies wearing little or no clothing in some quite delightful poses. If you are a red blooded male then these are sure to bring a smile to your face and get your pulse racing!
I believe that some people may be offended by such images (though I can't imagine why, as the naked human body is surely one of the more attractive of nature's creations) but to avoid any surprises this link will take you to the warning page Andy has created. From there, click on the link to enjoy his collection!
I believe that some people may be offended by such images (though I can't imagine why, as the naked human body is surely one of the more attractive of nature's creations) but to avoid any surprises this link will take you to the warning page Andy has created. From there, click on the link to enjoy his collection!
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
QSLing made easy
As regular visitors to the site will know, I'm a big fan of eQSL. I don't need QSLs for awards because I don't chase them, and in a hobby that has embraced the internet in just about every other aspect electronic QSLing seems to me to be the most logical way of confirming a contact that saves time and money. And more important than that, for me, is that it relieves me of a tiresome chore.
So when I read about GlobalQSL in John Harper AE4X's blog my immediate thought was: Why haven't I come across this before? As you'll see if you follow the links, it's a service that prints QSLs on demand and sends them to the bureau. You export your log to an ADIF file, upload it to the service, pay, and the job is done. As with regular printing services there is a minimum order of 100 QSLs and the price drops if you send 1,000 or more. You can also order blanks to be sent to yourself for direct QSL requests.
There is a free QSL designer program (for Windows) that you can download from the GlobalQSL site and use to design your card. As you can see from the sample above (and others on the site) the results are very professional and leave nothing to be desired. You can order 10 samples sent to you from your design for $8 to test the quality.
I created an account (it's free), logged in and found that there were 14 QSLs already printed and sent to me. I think GlobalQSL is a brilliant idea that retains the convenience of electronic QSLing but allows you to satisfy those contacts who prefer to receive real QSL cards.
So when I read about GlobalQSL in John Harper AE4X's blog my immediate thought was: Why haven't I come across this before? As you'll see if you follow the links, it's a service that prints QSLs on demand and sends them to the bureau. You export your log to an ADIF file, upload it to the service, pay, and the job is done. As with regular printing services there is a minimum order of 100 QSLs and the price drops if you send 1,000 or more. You can also order blanks to be sent to yourself for direct QSL requests.There is a free QSL designer program (for Windows) that you can download from the GlobalQSL site and use to design your card. As you can see from the sample above (and others on the site) the results are very professional and leave nothing to be desired. You can order 10 samples sent to you from your design for $8 to test the quality.
I created an account (it's free), logged in and found that there were 14 QSLs already printed and sent to me. I think GlobalQSL is a brilliant idea that retains the convenience of electronic QSLing but allows you to satisfy those contacts who prefer to receive real QSL cards.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




