José Alberto Nieto Ros, the developer of the new ROS digital mode, has submitted the technical specification of the mode to the FCC, as a result of which they conclude that ROS can not be viewed as Spread Spectrum and would be encompassed within the section 97.309 (RTTY and data emissions codes).
Now, all that needs to be resolved is the issue of where to use it without causing complaints from users of existing nets and other modes. Anyone with experience of getting quarts into pint pots please apply now.
Oh... threats of legal action?
ReplyDeleteuggh. My earlier negative blog comment on this matter remains.
ReplyDeleteMy fantasy scenario... the FCC allows the amateur bands to fall into anarchy then ban amateur radio in the USA because of the induced mayhem.
Lots of spectrum immediately available to commercial interests.
My fantasy only.
ROS is Legal in USA
ReplyDeleteAccording to the technical paper and the audio file attached, we conclude that ROS can not be viewed as Spread Spectrum and it would be encompassed within the section 97.309 (RTTY and data emissions codes).
Nobody forces him tp use ROS.
It is easy to be in his House seeing the television and to write in a forum on the legality of aWork.
At the time the programmer dedicate thousend of hours to the work of creating a new Digimode,for that
you were not paying anything