<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-953397841255562532.post1141539600196623154..comments</id><updated>2009-11-05T09:27:05.533Z</updated><title type='text'>Comments on G4ILO's Blog: No whispering for contacts</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/feeds/1141539600196623154/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/1141539600196623154/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/2009/11/no-whispering-for-contacts.html'/><author><name>Julian</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11984840704237681015</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-953397841255562532.post-34914578928808826</id><published>2009-11-05T09:27:05.533Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T09:27:05.533Z</updated><title type='text'>I think the JTxx modes would probably offer the be...</title><content type='html'>I think the JTxx modes would probably offer the best chance of a contact when WSPR is just making it. In the WSPR.net forum a couple of months ago Patrick F6IRF suggested using JT4A, but he abandoned this as he found results were poor. He then suggested trying JT65A, but I haven&amp;#39;t seen any reports as to whether this was successful.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/1141539600196623154/comments/default/34914578928808826'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/1141539600196623154/comments/default/34914578928808826'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/2009/11/no-whispering-for-contacts.html?showComment=1257413225533#c34914578928808826' title=''/><author><name>g4ilo</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11984840704237681015</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='10742384370470685512'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/2009/11/no-whispering-for-contacts.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-953397841255562532.post-1141539600196623154' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/posts/default/1141539600196623154' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-953397841255562532.post-4959177574941313744</id><published>2009-11-04T23:57:31.838Z</published><updated>2009-11-04T23:57:31.838Z</updated><title type='text'>I have, for a while, thought it was a pity that WS...</title><content type='html'>I have, for a while, thought it was a pity that WSPR reports showing that 2 stations obviuosly hearing each other are not having a QSO in real time.  This may not be realisable with signal to noise ratios in the order of -20dB or so with conventional modes.  But quite often you see SNRs with a positive value.  I would conclude from this that a CW or PSK31 contact should be possible for the path reported.  So far I have not seen anyone mention that they have achieved a QSO first suggested by a WSPR report.  Maybe food for thought?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As an aside, I have tonight been sampling a few pints of your local real ale brew from Jennings - Cockerhoop - here in West Bromwich.   Very pleasant!   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers Ju;ian   de MAurice   G4DVM.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/1141539600196623154/comments/default/4959177574941313744'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/1141539600196623154/comments/default/4959177574941313744'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/2009/11/no-whispering-for-contacts.html?showComment=1257379051838#c4959177574941313744' title=''/><author><name>g4dvm</name><uri>http://openid.aol.com/g4dvm</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/2009/11/no-whispering-for-contacts.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-953397841255562532.post-1141539600196623154' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/posts/default/1141539600196623154' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-953397841255562532.post-3850345489640366890</id><published>2009-11-04T22:25:02.529Z</published><updated>2009-11-04T22:25:02.529Z</updated><title type='text'>I too would have to reluctantly agree that is not ...</title><content type='html'>I too would have to reluctantly agree that is not a bonafide QSO, and certainly not valid for credit towards any traditional AWARDS. But with the advent of eQSL et al, it would seem that a pseudo or virtual category could exist where the long standing practice and tradition of QSL exchange could take place in a diminished state. And even pAWARDs with extra value placed on low power or antenna handicap, etc. Why not it is a Hobby, not the bloody Olympics here. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the 2 minute window, I believe it is a remnant of the program&amp;#39;s EME origins. I&amp;#39;ll dig it up and learn up on it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I would also humbly predict that based on my S/N ratios, anywhere that WSPR can establish a 2 way link a traditional Olivia QSO &amp;quot;could&amp;quot; take place, maybe we should try it.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/1141539600196623154/comments/default/3850345489640366890'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/1141539600196623154/comments/default/3850345489640366890'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/2009/11/no-whispering-for-contacts.html?showComment=1257373502529#c3850345489640366890' title=''/><author><name>Jorge Luis - ki4SGU</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02509722226393840624</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.g4ilo.com/2009/11/no-whispering-for-contacts.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-953397841255562532.post-1141539600196623154' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/953397841255562532/posts/default/1141539600196623154' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>